Neuroscientist V. S. Ramachandran provides an introduction to how we study the brain’s deficits.
Neuroscientist V. S. Ramachandran provides an introduction to how we study the brain’s deficits using three cool examples:
Continue reading “Ramachandran on Capgras Syndrome, Phantom Limbs & Synaesthesia”
The Times (of London) has a good skeptical piece by Professor Raymond Tallis on the dubious rise of neurolaw.
The Times (of London) has a good skeptical piece by Professor Raymond Tallis on the dubious rise of neurolaw:
The legal profession in America is taking an increasing interest in neuroscience. There is a flourishing academic discipline of “neurolaw” and neurolawyers are penetrating the legal system. Vanderbilt University recently opened a $27 million neuroimaging centre and hopes to enrol students in a programme in the law and neuroscience. In the courts, as in the trial of serial rapist and murderer Bobby Joe Long, brain-scan evidence is being invoked in support of pleas of diminished responsibility. The idea is abroad that developments in neuroscience – in particular the observation of activity in the living brain, using techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging – have shown us that we are not as free, or as accountable for our actions, as we traditionally thought.
Which leads defence lawyers to try arguing their clients didn’t commit murder – it’s their brains that are to blame.
Data collected at bars and fraternity parties on the UMass campus has yielded unexpected conclusions with regard to the practice of binge drinking.
A wry smile, courtesy of The Onion:
“Data collected at bars and fraternity parties on the UMass campus has yielded unexpected conclusions with regard to the practice of binge drinking,” study head Dr. Albert Greaves said. “Over the course of our research, a consistent pattern emerged demonstrating that binge drinking seriously kicks ass.”
“There was this one bar called The Depot, where they serve beer in these humongous three-foot glasses that are like giant boots,” Greaves continued. “You have to stand back and tilt the thing to drink it all. Our team conducted an experiment to see who could finish one off the fastest. Myself, Dr. Milton Laurian and these eight 20-year-old test subjects lined up against a wall and started chugging away. After completing the test and subsequently throwing up all over the place, I could only conclude that downing huge-ass boot beers is really awesome.”
Now read on (via The Language Log).
Continue reading “College Binge Drinking ‘Seriously Kicks Ass’”
Roberts considers Larry David to be the perfect proxy for a schizophrenic person.
From The New Yorker:
[Trainee clinical psychologist, David] Roberts began showing TV clips during therapy sessions [with schizophrenia patients]. Soon he had narrowed his selections down to one show: television’s purest expression of social dysfunction, “Curb Your Enthusiasm.” Roberts considers Larry David to be the perfect proxy for a schizophrenic person. “On his way into his dentist’s office, he holds the door open for a woman, and, as a result, she’s seen first,” he said. “He stews, he fumes, he explodes. He’s breaking the social rules that folks with schizophrenia often break. […] It’s a classic example of a major social cognitive error-jumping to conclusions – that schizophrenic patients are prone to.”
Continue reading “Larry David is Role Model for Schizophrenia Sufferers”
The Most Dangerous Animal of David Livingstone Smith’s title is, of course, man.
‘The Most Dangerous Animal‘ of David Livingstone Smith’s title is, of course, man. It is man’s continued determination to band together in order to slay members of its own species that qualifies us for this most dubious of superlatives. The question this book tackles is simply: why? Smith employs a variety of academic disciplines to answer this question. It crosses territory from psychoanalysis to prehistoric archaeology and even microbiology, but the heart of his argument lies in evolutionary psychology.
Continue reading “Why War? The Most Dangerous Animal by David Livingstone Smith”
The king of weird psychology studies here in the UK is Professor Richard Wiseman.
The king of weird psychology studies here in the UK is Professor Richard Wiseman who has published books on magic
, luck
and psychics
. Wiseman is the author of a new book, ‘Quirkology: How We Discover the Big Truths in Small Things
‘ which contains some interesting ‘coctail party’ psychology. Here’s a taster of some of some of his work. Please make sure your cocktail glass’s rim is liberally coated with salt.
Continue reading “Professor Richard Wiseman is King of Weird Psychology Studies”
Continuing my search for intelligent life in the blogosphere, I wanted to introduce you to a blog I’ve belatedly realised is excellent.
Continuing my search for intelligent life in the blogosphere, I wanted to introduce you to a blog I’ve belatedly realised is excellent. ‘Overcoming Bias‘ is from Oxford University’s ‘Future of Humanity Institute‘ whose mission statement says they are:
“…pursu[ing the] big picture questions for humanity. We study how anticipated technological developments may affect the human condition in fundamental ways, and how we can better understand, evaluate, and respond to radical change.”
Continue reading “Big Picture Questions for Humanity from ‘Overcoming Bias’”
In the spirit of open-minded exploration I have been looking around at blogs outside psychology to see what’s going on.
In the spirit of open-minded exploration I have been looking around at blogs outside psychology to see what’s going on. As I mentioned earlier in the week I’m particularly interested in blogs on physics and sociology – two fine bedfellows! Nothing on sociology yet but here’s a couple of physics blogs and one where the professors ‘rate’ their students, letting out all that bottled up tension.
Continue reading “Accessible Science Blogging Outside Psychology”
It’s so hard to be rich nowadays that people need special help from ‘wealth psychologists’.
It’s so hard to be rich nowadays that people need special help from ‘wealth psychologists’. Apparently one of the problems frequently faced by the rich is guilt. Along with this there’s the question of how to raise kids responsibly when almost anything is affordable. Financial management firms are now hiring their own in-house psychologists to help those rolling in piles of filthy lucre.
The tone of an email is incredibly easy to misinterpret, explains emotional intelligence expert Daniel Goleman, writing in the New York Times.
The tone of an email is incredibly easy to misinterpret, explains emotional intelligence expert Daniel Goleman, writing in the New York Times. The main problem is there is no channel to convey our emotion – other than emoticons which are notoriously crude.
We’ve all done it: written something that’s meant to be a joke in an email and then received a cold response when the message is misunderstood. Or received an email we can’t make head nor tail of. Is this a joke or are they being serious?
Join the free PsyBlog mailing list. No spam, ever.
