The Enjoyable Cultural Habit That Slows Biological Aging (M)
Just one cultural activity a week may match some of the benefits of regular exercise.
Just one cultural activity a week may match some of the benefits of regular exercise.
A personality trait usually seen as a weakness may have an unexpected advantage hidden beneath the surface.
A personality trait usually seen as a weakness may have an unexpected advantage hidden beneath the surface.
High levels of creativity may go hand-in-hand with neuroticism.
This may be because the area of the brain linked to creativity also tends to promote overthinking and worry.
Neuroticism is characterised by negative thinking in a range of areas.
For many years, researchers believed that highly neurotic people had a heightened sensitivity to threat.
This doesn’t fit the facts, though, explains Dr Adam Perkins, the study’s first author, said:
“…it’s pretty difficult to explain neuroticism in terms of magnified threat perception because high scorers often feel unhappy in situations where there is no threat at all.
The second problem is, there’s literature showing neuroticism scores are positively correlated with creativity; and so why should having a magnified view of threat objects make you good at coming up with new ideas?”
The neuroscientists noticed, however, that neurotic people show high activity in part of the medial prefrontal cortex.
This area also plays an important role in self-generated thoughts.
Dr Adam Perkins said:
“It occurred to me that if you happen to have a preponderance of negatively hued self-generated thoughts due to high levels of spontaneous activity in the parts of the medial prefrontal cortex that govern conscious perception of threat and you also have a tendency to switch to panic sooner than average people, due to possessing especially high reactivity in the basolateral nuclei of the amygdale, then that means you can experience intense negative emotions even when there’s no threat present.
This could mean that for specific neural reasons, high scorers on neuroticism have a highly active imagination, which acts as a built-in threat generator.”
Dr Perkins said the theory may help explain some of the positive aspects of neuroticism:
“We’re still a long way off from fully explaining neuroticism, and we’re not offering all of the answers, but we hope that our new theory will help people make sense of their own experiences, and show that although being highly neurotic is by definition unpleasant, it also has creative benefits.
Hopefully our theory will also stimulate new research as it provides us with a straightforward unifying framework to tie together the creative aspects of neuroticism with its emotional aspects.”
The study was published in the journal Trends in Cognitive Sciences (Perkins et al., 2015).
Creativity partly emerges from the open mental state triggered by these films.
A hidden bias that could be causing people to overlook their most creative ideas.
A hidden bias that could be causing people to overlook their most creative ideas.
A creativity study reveals that it is often people’s second-best idea that ends up being rated the most creative.
When fleshing out an idea from the initial moment of inspiration, it turns out that the second-best idea is the one that tends to gain wings.
More abstract ideas are also likely to be more creative, the study found, although we naturally tend to overlook abstraction.
Dr Justin M. Berg, the study’s author, said:
“Evaluating creativity is difficult.
A lot of research suggests that people are not very good at it, that a number of biases and challenges get in the way.”
For the study, people were asked to tackle a series of creative challenges, such as designing a way to stop people falling asleep in self-driving cars.
Participants were asked to come up with three initial solutions, which they then ranked best to worst.
Afterwards, each of the ideas was fleshed out before they were shown to a group of experts and consumers to rate creativity.
Dr Berg found a surprisingly consistent pattern:
“People’s most promising initial ideas were consistently ranked second.
People are not terrible at identifying their best initial idea, and they are not terrible in a non-random way, which means they can get better at it.”
Ideas that were more abstract were also more likely to be creative, something that people generally disregarded.
Dr Berg said:
“People value concreteness too much and abstractness too little in their initial ideas.
The best initial ideas likely won’t seem very creative at the beginning—there may not be enough substance to see their potential originality and usefulness.
Their abstractness is a barrier that prevents people from spotting their potential.”
When generating more than three ideas, it is worth looking in the top half of the list, said Dr Berg:
“When you have lots of initial ideas, your most promising idea might not be your second favorite.
Instead, it may be somewhere in the top half of your predicted rankings, below the idea ranked first but above the ideas you think are your worst.
We’re probably all killing a lot of our best ideas early in the creative process without knowing it.”
The study was published in the journal Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (Berg, 2019).
Creativity is not just talent, it is also technique. Here are 24 ways to boost innovation.
Creativity boosts your mood, but then sometimes backfires.
A brief reflection exercise dramatically increases the number and quality of ideas people generate.
This factor matters more than personality traits in predicting when people will take up creative activities.
Creativity is not the exclusive domain of youth.
Creativity is not the exclusive domain of youth.
There are two peaks for creativity across the lifespan.
One occurs — as you might imagine — in the mid-20s and a second comes later, in the mid-50s.
At least, these are the ages at which people are most likely to do the work that bags them a Nobel Prize.
Professor Bruce Weinberg, the study’s first author, said:
“Many people believe that creativity is exclusively associated with youth, but it really depends on what kind of creativity you’re talking about.”
The conclusions come from an analysis of Nobel Prize winners in Economics over the years, although Professor Weinberg thinks the results apply to creativity generally.
‘Conceptual’ innovators tended to do their best work in their 20s, the results revealed.
Experimentalists, though, were more likely to get the Nobel Prize for work done in their 50s.
Professor Weinberg said:
“Whether you hit your creative peak early or late in your career depends on whether you have a conceptual or experimental approach.”
The probable reason is that being new to a field helps conceptualists, because they are not yet bogged down with accepted views.
Experimentalists, though, need time to accumulate their findings, digging slowly, layer after layer, until they unearth the mother lode.
The same is likely true for other areas of creativity outside the sciences.
Breakthrough ideas are more likely to come from the young, but older people have more time to perfect their art.
Other studies have compared different disciplines to look for creative peaks.
These have generally found that scientific creativity peaks in people’s mid-30s to early 40s.
Professor Weinberg said:
“These studies attribute differences in creative peaks to the nature of the scientific fields themselves, not to the scientists doing the work.
Our research suggests than when you’re most creative is less a product of the scientific field that you’re in and is more about how you approach the work you do.”
The study was published in the journal De Economist (Weinberg & Galenson, 2019).
The creativity activities that rewire vulnerable brain regions, creating a shield against cognitive decline.
Join the free PsyBlog mailing list. No spam, ever.