The Astonishing Effects Of A 2-Week Mobile Internet Break (M)
Researchers tested what happens when you block mobile internet — here is the incredible effect on attention and mood.
Researchers tested what happens when you block mobile internet — here is the incredible effect on attention and mood.
Explore the dual nature of online disinhibition, its causes, and how it influences communication and behaviour online.
Online disinhibition refers to the phenomenon where individuals express themselves more freely and impulsively in online settings compared to face-to-face interactions.
Online disinhibition describes the reduced restraint individuals exhibit in digital environments.
This can manifest in increased openness, sharing, and candour, or alternatively in aggression, rudeness, and harmful behaviours.
The term captures how the digital realm alters behaviour by reducing social inhibitions.
Online interactions often allow individuals to experiment with their self-expression, sometimes leading to personal growth and discovery.
However, it can also expose vulnerabilities, as the lack of face-to-face cues can result in misunderstandings or over-sharing.
Online disinhibition can be categorised into two main types:
The balance between these two types often depends on the context and the individual’s intent behind their behaviour.
Several factors contribute to the phenomenon of online disinhibition:
These factors interact in complex ways, influencing whether online disinhibition manifests positively or negatively.
The effects of online disinhibition are multifaceted and can impact both individuals and society:
The dual nature of online disinhibition requires careful management to maximise its benefits while minimising its drawbacks.
Efforts to reduce harmful online disinhibition involve a combination of individual, community, and platform-level actions:
Combining these strategies can create safer and more inclusive online environments.
The manifestation of online disinhibition varies across cultures, influenced by societal norms and values.
In individualistic cultures, online disinhibition may emphasise personal freedom and expression.
In collectivist cultures, it might focus on group dynamics, potentially amplifying both harmony and conflict.
Understanding these variations helps tailor interventions and guidelines to specific contexts.
Research into cultural differences also sheds light on how online platforms can be designed to accommodate diverse user bases.
Real-world examples provide insights into the effects of online disinhibition:
These examples highlight the need for nuanced approaches to managing online disinhibition.
In educational settings, online disinhibition presents unique opportunities and challenges:
Educators can address these challenges by fostering respectful online communities and setting clear expectations.
The use of collaborative tools and moderated platforms can also help mitigate negative behaviours.
As digital interactions continue to evolve, future research will likely explore:
Understanding these trends will inform the development of more effective tools and policies to manage online behaviour.
Further exploration into generational differences and their impact on online disinhibition could provide additional insights.
Online disinhibition is a complex phenomenon that profoundly influences digital interactions.
By recognising its types, factors, and implications, individuals and organisations can harness its benefits while mitigating its drawbacks.
Through education, thoughtful platform design, and cultural awareness, the challenges of online disinhibition can be addressed, paving the way for healthier and more inclusive online communities.
In navigating this phenomenon, a collective effort from users, platforms, and policymakers is essential for a balanced and constructive digital future.
“Nothing travels faster than the speed of light, with the possible exception of bad news, which obeys its own special laws.” ― Douglas Adams, Mostly Harmless
“Nothing travels faster than the speed of light, with the possible exception of bad news, which obeys its own special laws.” ― Douglas Adams, Mostly Harmless
Fake news really does obey its own laws, travelling farther and faster than the truth, according to new research published in the journal Science.
It’s not down to automated X accounts reposting fake news, the researchers discovered.
Instead, the real reason fake news travels faster than the truth is that people are 70 percent more likely to pass it on than real news, because it’s new and exciting.
The research into how people retweet or pass on stories online found that it took six times longer for real news to reach people than its fake counterpart.
False statements are passed on at every level much more readily than the truth.
People find lies much more interesting than the boring old truth.
Professor Sinan Aral, study co-author, said:
“We found that falsehood diffuses significantly farther, faster, deeper, and more broadly than the truth, in all categories of information, and in many cases by an order of magnitude.”
For the study, the researchers tracked 126,000 cascades of news stories spreading out through X.
It included 4.5 million tweets by around 3 million people between 2006 and 2017.
News stories analysed included urban legends, science, terrorism, entertainment, natural disasters, politics and more.
The results showed that fake political news was the most likely to be retweeted.
Professor Aral said:
“False news is more novel, and people are more likely to share novel information.
And on social networks, people can gain attention by being the first to share previously unknown (but possibly false) information.
People who share novel information are seen as being in the know.”
People tended to be more disgusted and surprised by fake news.
Whereas real news engendered sadness, trust and anticipation.
The study was published in the journal Science (Vosoughi et al., 2018).
Study reveals the biggest social media red flag for a terrorist.
The more intensely people used social media, the more likely they were to have these experiences.
This study shows how to break free from unrealistic beauty standards in one week.
What digital tech is doing to us, why it is so addictive, the amount that is damaging and how to do a digital detox.
Social media emerges as a catalyst in the progression towards unhappiness for those with a certain mindset.
A consumer psychologist was inspired to carry out the research after he forwarded a YouTube video to his sister and it was blocked.
Unfortunately, the majority of people who get cosmetic surgery are still dissatisfied with their appearance afterwards.
Join the free PsyBlog mailing list. No spam, ever.