A Sign That You Are Highly Creative (M)

Proust, Chekhov and Darwin were all easily distracted, but it gave them one big advantage.

Proust, Chekhov and Darwin were all easily distracted, but it gave them one big advantage.

Keep reading with a Membership

• Read members-only articles
• Adverts removed
• Cancel at any time
• 14 day money-back guarantee for new members

This Word Game Reveals A Really Creative Mind (M)

A simple word game reveals higher levels of divergent thinking, a critical component of creativity.

A simple word game reveals higher levels of divergent thinking, a critical component of creativity.

Keep reading with a Membership

• Read members-only articles
• Adverts removed
• Cancel at any time
• 14 day money-back guarantee for new members

A 20-Minute Break Is Essential To Creativity

How to take the ‘road less travelled’.

How to take the ‘road less travelled’.

Incentives can help people be more creative, if they are followed by time to think, research finds.

An ‘incubation period’ is key to producing the most creative results.

In fact, when people are incentivised to be creative they do not come up with more ideas straight away.

Stepping away from the problem for a period — even 20 minutes is enough — allows people to produce more creative solutions.

Together, incentives plus a rest period produce more creative results, the study found.

Professor Steven Kachelmeier, the study’s first author, said:

“Creativity is not instantaneous, but if incentives promote enough ideas as seeds for thought, creativity eventually emerges.”

For the study, one group of participants were paid based on the number of ideas they came up with, another group were given a fixed sum.

When given a creativity test straight away there was no difference in the number of ideas they came up with

However, they returned 10 days later to try the creativity task again.

The results showed that people who were paid based on how many ideas they came up with were more creative when they returned.

A further study showed that a 20-minute walk was enough of a gape to boost the creativity of people who were already incentivised.

Professor Kachelmeier said:

“You need to rest, take a break and detach yourself — even if that detachment is just 20 minutes.

The recipe for creativity is try — and get frustrated because it’s not going to happen.

Relax, sit back, and then it happens.”

Incentives appear to encourage people to come up with ideas that are more divergent.

In other words, despite initially coming up with roughly the same number of ideas, the ideas themselves were more different from each other.

The study was published in the Accounting Review (Kachelmeier et al., 2019).

Listening To Music Does NOT Boost Creativity, Study Finds

For more creative insight, it is better to work in silence or with only steady background noise.

For more creative insight, it is better to work in silence or with only steady background noise.

Many people believe that music can enhance creativity, but a recent study finds the reverse.

Instead of boosting creativity, people are less creative while listening to music, psychologists have found.

Unlike background noise, music may distract from a creative task, rather than enhance it.

For more creative insight, it is better to work in silence or with only steady background noise.

The conclusions come from a study in which people took a standard psychological test of verbal insight.

People were given three words, such as ‘dress’, ‘dial’ and ‘flower’.

They are asked to find another single word that can be put with all three to make three new words or phrases.

[See the bottom of the article for the answer.]

The researchers then tested three different types of background music:

  1. Background music with foreign (unfamiliar) lyrics.
  2. Instrumental music without lyrics.
  3. Music with familiar lyrics.

All of these they compared to the steady, but quiet, background noise you might get in a library.

The results showed that all the different types of music — even instrumental without lyrics — impaired people’s ability on the creativity test.

Dr Neil McLatchie, study co-author, said:

“We found strong evidence of impaired performance when playing background music in comparison to quiet background conditions.”

A further study tested if it made any difference if people regularly listened to music while working and if the music put them in a better mood.

The results still showed that for creativity, it was better to work in silence or with a ‘steady state’ background noise.

The study’s authors write:

“To conclude, the findings here challenge the popular view that music enhances creativity, and instead demonstrate that music, regardless of the presence of semantic content (no lyrics, familiar lyrics or unfamiliar lyrics), consistently disrupts creative performance in insight problem solving.”

→ The answer is ‘sun’, making sundress, sundial and sunflower.

The study was published in the journal Applied Cognitive Psychology (Threadgold et al., 2019).

Creativity Peaks At Two Different Ages

Creativity is not the exclusive domain of youth.

Creativity is not the exclusive domain of youth.

There are two peaks for creativity across the lifespan, new research finds.

One occurs — as you might imagine — in the mid-20s and a second comes later, in the mid-50s.

At least, these are the ages at which people are most likely to do the work that bags them a Nobel Prize.

Professor Bruce Weinberg, the study’s first author, said:

“Many people believe that creativity is exclusively associated with youth, but it really depends on what kind of creativity you’re talking about.”

The conclusions come from an analysis of Nobel Prize winners in Economics over the years, although Professor Weinberg thinks the results apply to creativity generally.

‘Conceptual’ innovators tended to do their best work in their 20s, the results revealed.

Experimentalists, though, were more likely to get the Nobel Prize for work done in their 50s.

Professor Weinberg said:

“Whether you hit your creative peak early or late in your career depends on whether you have a conceptual or experimental approach.”

The probable reason is that being new to a field helps conceptualists, because they are not yet bogged down with accepted views.

Experimentalists, though, need time to accumulate their findings, digging slowly, layer after layer, until they unearth the mother lode.

The same is likely true for other areas of creativity outside the sciences.

Breakthrough ideas are more likely to come from the young, but older people have more time to perfect their art.

Creative peak

Other studies have compared different disciplines to look for creative peaks.

These have generally found that scientific creativity peaks in people’s mid-30s to early 40s.

Professor Weinberg said:

“These studies attribute differences in creative peaks to the nature of the scientific fields themselves, not to the scientists doing the work.

Our research suggests than when you’re most creative is less a product of the scientific field that you’re in and is more about how you approach the work you do.”

The study was published in the journal De Economist (Weinberg & Galenson, 2019).

Get free email updates

Join the free PsyBlog mailing list. No spam, ever.