Happy Childhoods Do Not Guarantee Good Mental Health

Mental health problems can strike anyone.

Mental health problems can strike anyone.

A happy childhood does not guarantee against developing mental health problems later on, a study finds.

Even people who experience many positive early childhood experiences can go on to develop anxiety and depression or other mental health issues.

It shows how mental health problems can strike anyone.

The research also reaffirms the connection between negative childhood experiences and mental health problems, like depression and paranoia.

While childhood experiences can set the tone for our lives, they do not determine our destiny.

Rather our mental health depends on how we adapt to stressful circumstances in adulthood.

Those who fail to cope are those who are more likely to succumb.

The conclusions come a study that tracked over 300 children in Australia.

Ms Bianca Kahl, the study’s first author, said:

“This research shows that mental health conditions are not solely determined by early life events, and that a child who is raised in a happy home, could still grow up to have a mental health disorder.

There’s certainly some missing factors in understanding how our childhood environment and early life experiences might translate into mental health outcomes in adulthood.

We suspect that it’s our expectations about our environments and our ability to adapt to scenarios when our expectations are not being met, that may be influencing our experiences of distress.

If, as children, we learn how to adapt to change, and we learn how to cope when things do not go our way, we may be in a better position to respond to stress and other risk factors for poor mental health.

Testing this hypothesis is the focus of the next research study.”

The study was published in the journal Current Psychology (Kahl et al., 2020).

People Are Happier After Revealing Secret Problems

Revealing a stigmatised identity is linked to reduced psychological stress.

Revealing a stigmatised identity is linked to reduced psychological stress.

Telling other people about a hidden mental health problem has broadly positive consequences, research finds.

The same is true of a hidden disability or other stigmatised identity.

People who revealed experiencing depression, being gay or a physical health problem that was not obvious, reported increased satisfaction with life.

Those expressing non-visible stigmas felt less anxiety at work, more certainty and greater job satisfaction in the long-run.

Outside work, people revealing a stigmatised identity felt less psychological stress.

However, the same was not true for people who had stigmatised identities that were clearly visible.

It seems there is something particularly damaging about hidden identities.

Dr Eden King, the study’s co-author, said:

“Identities that are immediately observable operate differently than those that are concealable.

The same kinds of difficult decisions about whether or not to disclose the identity — not to mention the questions of to whom, how, when and where to disclose those identities — are probably less central to their psychological experiences.”

The conclusions come from a review of 65 separate studies that examined what happened after people revealed their mental illness, sexual orientation, pregnancy or physical disability to others.

The results showed that most people were supportive of hidden stigmas.

The same positive boost was not seen for identities that were clearly visible, Dr King said:

“People react negatively to those who express or call attention to stigmas that are clearly visible to others, such as race or gender, as this may be seen as a form of advocacy or heightened pride in one’s identity.”

The study was published in the Journal of Business and Psychology (Sabat et al., 2019).

One Key To Boosting Mental Health In Lockdown

People with this amenity are less likely to suffer depression and anxiety during lockdown.

People with this amenity are less likely to suffer depression and anxiety during lockdown.

Access to nature is key to surviving lockdown, a new study finds.

People who are able to get out into nature are less likely to suffer depression and anxiety during lockdown.

Even a natural view from inside can help to ameliorate the effects of COVID-19 related policies.

The conclusions come from a study that examined the mental health of people in various European countries as governments imposed lockdowns of different scales.

Spain, for example, imposed one of the most severe lockdowns: for a period, people were forbidden to go outside, even to walk.

The UK and Norway, though, did allow people access to nature.

Dr Sarai Pouso, the study’s first author, explained the results:

“The main conclusion is that people who were under the strictest lockdown during the first wave of COVID-19 (those who were only allowed to go out for work or essentials purchases, as was the case of Italy and Spain) were more likely to show symptoms compatible with depression and anxiety, compared to countries with more relaxed lockdowns where people could still visit natural places such as parks.”

Nine countries were included in the analysis, comprising the responses of over 5,000 people.

The researchers also tested whether having a garden or view of nature from the home was important.

They found that green spaces visible from the home were much more important for the mental health of people under the most severe lockdown.

Dr María C. Uyarra, study co-author, said:

“The results indicate that having access from the home to outdoor spaces (e.g., garden, balcony) and having window views to open spaces or natural element (e.g., coast, park, forest) decreased the probability of showing symptoms of depression.

Furthermore, people with access to outdoor spaces and with nature views, managed to maintain a more positive mood during lockdown.”

Pandemic or not, green and blue spaces have a remarkable healing effect on people’s mental health.

→ Read on: 10 Remarkable Ways Nature Can Heal Your Mind

The study was published in the journal Science of The Total Environment (Pouso et al., 2020).

The Biggest Myth About Coping With Mental Illness

When experiencing psychological distress, people first use self-soothing techniques and social support.

When experiencing psychological distress, people first use self-soothing techniques and social support.

It is commonly believed that people in mental distress fail to use healthy coping strategies and are not resilient.

In other words, people with mental health problems are thought ‘weak’.

This is a myth.

New research reveals that many people experiencing mental health problems are resilient and already use many healthy strategies like distraction and meditation.

Indeed, these healthy strategies work up to a point — it is just that their levels of distress are too great.

The conclusions come from a survey of 509 young people who were asked about their mental health and any strategies they used to cope with it.

Professor Helen Stallman, the study’s first author, explained the results:

“We found that the majority of extremely distressed people already used healthy coping methods such as mindfulness techniques before turning to unhealthy methods to feel better such as emotional eating, aggression, alcohol, drugs and self-harm, social withdrawal and suicidality.”

When experiencing psychological distress, people started by using self-soothing techniques and social support.

When these did not work to alleviate mental pain, some moved on to seek professional support.

Once people were experiencing very high levels of distress, they tended to use more unhealthy ways of coping like drink, drugs, social withdrawal and worse.

Professor Helen Stallman, the study’s first author, said:

“What we have found busts the myth that mental health services and workers should encourage extremely distressed people to build resilience or learn healthy coping strategies like relaxing or distracting activities.

Support should not focus on ‘fixing’ the person who is suffering, it should focus on other ways to help reduce their overwhelming distress.

While we may consider people in mental distress to be lacking in resilience, they are the most resilient people but have too much to cope with.”

Professor Stallman advocates a model called “Care, Collaborate, Connect.”

She explains:

“‘Care’ is the initial intervention when someone is upset, so listening without interrupting and validating their experience.

‘Collaborate’ starts with asking how they are coping and ‘connect’ involves suggesting they talk to a health professional, like their GP, if things keep getting them down.”

The study was published in the Journal of Affective Disorders Reports (Stallman et al., 2020).

Get free email updates

Join the free PsyBlog mailing list. No spam, ever.