Is Happier Always Better? Socially Yes, Financially No

But happiness is much more complex than this. For example dissatisfaction with our current job probably helps motivate us to get a better one. A person who is happy with their job is less likely to strive for a change. In our relationships, though, less happiness might encourage us to chop and change our partner, perhaps leading to a less satisfactory social life.
What, then, is the optimum level of happiness?
Some of the first hints at the answer to this question are provided by a new study carried out by Oishi, Diener and Diener (2007) who have analysed an impressive amount of data. Thousands of people in almost 100 countries answered questions about their happiness, income levels and relationships over decades of their lives.
To give you an idea of where the data came from, in one dataset freshman students were asked how cheerful they were at the start of their courses. Nineteen years later they reported their income. Other similar datasets were obtained in Australia, Germany and the UK.
Across all the studies, the data revealed two very interesting findings:
1. Happiness and income
Overall, higher levels of income and education were associated with higher levels of happiness, but with one important exception. At the highest levels of happiness, educational attainment and income started to decrease.
In fact the relationship between achievement and happiness is curvilinear - the graph looks like a hill with the peak at about '7' or '8' on a scale of 1 to 10 where '1' is very dissatisfied and '10' is very satisfied. Up around 10, where people report the highest levels of satisfaction, their income and education have significantly dropped compared to those who peg it at 7 or 8.
2. Happiness and relationships
There's a subtly different story for satisfaction with relationships. Instead of seeing a curve there is a straight line. So the happier we are, the more likely we are to be satisfied with our relationships. Those scoring a '10' on the happiness scale are also the most satisfied with their relationships.
Varying effects of happiness
What I like about this study is that it begins to show the complexity of happiness: that it can have different effects on different parts of our lives.
It also challenges the idea that more happiness is always better. It's difficult to be much more specific than that because this study measures people's happiness in a very general way.
Happiness is, of course, bound to vary from day to day. These variations certainly have important effects on other aspects of our lives. For example, dissatisfaction with our job may prove a powerful motivation for us to make an improvement. After that change is made, our happiness increases.
Studies such as this one clearly cannot tell us much about these dynamics but what they can do is hint at overall patterns. They emphasise the fact that extremely high levels of happiness are not always 'a good thing'.
» Discover more articles in this series on the new science of happiness.
» If you enjoyed this post, subscribe to PsyBlog (RSS).
References
Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2006). The desirability of happiness across cultures. Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Oishi, S., Diener, E., & Diener, E. (2007) The Optimum Level of Well-Being. Can People Be Too Happy? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 346-360.
Labels: Happiness, Positive Psychology

6 comments
Sometimes I feel happy for no reason. I call up my wife, a hospital administrator, and tell her. She tells me the reason I am so happy is that I don't have her job. I have a goverment job with little or no stress. Perhaps that is why I am happy.
"It also challenges the idea that more happiness is always better."
Granted, in the abstract one may be able to specify value sets that do not prioritize happiness, but in the real world we're humans who have evolved to develop value sets whose ultimate end* is happiness. Therefore, to argue that for humans more happiness isn't always better is simply absurd. The proper interpretation of the noted research is that beyond a certain point, the consumerist/competitive striving for wealth is actively detrimental to what we want the most (happiness). It's also interesting that there's a non-monotonic relationship between happiness and education, though this also may not be news as historical and personal anecdotes abound regarding the isolating and often anxiolytic effects of increased knowledge.
* -> Of course happiness is not the ultimate end from a gene's-eye-view, but happiness is one of the more potent carrots that genes use to lead their hosts to do their bidding.
It seems I misused the term 'anxiolytic' in my comment above where I intended the term 'anxiety-provoking'.
Very interesting. I'm still contemplating whether being 100% happy 24/7 is "a good thing." It's an extremely complex issue.
Who's "happier"? The Buddhist monk who is happy 24/7 (at least according to brain scans and the monk's own words) or the filthy rich CEO who claims to be the happiest man alive?
It seems objective to say that it is better to not be happy 100% of the time. It depends on what you value in life. If you believe that one should always strive to increase knowledge or wealth or that everyone has some purpose, then being unsatisfied at times will ensure that that person will continue to make changes (unless of course that person is so unsatisfied that they fall into debilitating depression). If you believe that nothing matters other that how you feel, then being completely and utterly happy all the time is the ultimate goal. It seems that it is up to each person to decide what value happiness holds for them.
Dr. Christopher K. Hsee are doing great in the field of happiness researching, hope you can introduce some of his study in the future.
http://faculty.chicagogsb.edu/christopher.hsee/vita/index.htm
anyway, I really appreciate your brilliant work on this website, keep it up, bro!