Attentional Blink and the Stream of Consciousness

Yesterday I was sitting in a park staring off into the distance, without a care in the world.
The park was empty, the sky blue, trees rustling; a small lake shimmering in the distance, nudging its banks. A lone figure approached across the grass, not yet identifiable as a man or a woman in the haze; I returned to my reverie, lulled by the air sliding across my brow, lost to sensation.
Then in an instant the figure, now obviously a man, was not 5 metres away, striding towards me. He had travelled 50 metres in what seemed like the blink of an eye. My muscles tensed and I prepared to defend myself. He reached where I sat, then turned away, following the path past and away from me, leaving me looking both surprised and foolish.
It was obvious I had been distracted for much longer than I thought -- long enough for the man to walk 50 metres -- but still it felt to me as though he had covered the distance in an instant. In fact the man had simply fallen through the cracks in my consciousness.
Attentional blink
Just how frequent these cracks are is demonstrated by a classic study which was the first in the psychological literature to report the phenomenon of 'attentional blink' (Broadbent and Broadbent, 1987; PDF). These researchers were inspired by unpublished reports that participants in psychology studies, after focusing their attention on a particular target, showed a strange gap in their attention -- a kind of blind spot.
To examine it Broadbent and Broadbent flashed up a series of five-letter words to participants at about 10 every second and asked them to search for two particular words. Normally people are remarkably good at this sort of test despite the words only being shown for a tenth of a second -- they will usually spot about 80% of the targets.
But what Broadbent and Broadbent found was that when one target followed the other in quick succession (less than half a second apart) participants didn't notice the second item and the average proportion of correct reports went down to almost 0%. It was as though participants' attention had 'blinked' for half a second after spotting the first target and so they didn't notice the second.
This phenomenon has subsequently been extensively examined and even found in the auditory domain (Koelewijn & Van der Burg, 2007). One strong explanation for it is a processing bottle-neck. When spotting the first thing we're looking for it takes an attentional effort to focus on it. This maxes out the brain's processing abilities for as much as half a second, during which time our attention is effectively blinking.
During that half a second it's as though the unconscious is knocking on the door of consciousness to report something interesting. Effectively it takes us half a second to answer the door and see who's there, but in the meantime we don't notice the phone ringing and the kettle boiling.
The stream of consciousness?
What the attentional blink demonstrates is the illusory component of our everyday experience of consciousness. We experience the world as one long continuous stream of thoughts, feelings and events, each neatly seguing into the next. But the existence of the attentional blink points to a somewhat different story.
Our brains are actually paying attention to one event or thing which swallows up our attention, blocking out other inputs for short periods, then it releases and fixates on something else. In this sense consciousness is less of a smooth stream and more of a bumpy ride.
Reading is a good analogy. When we read the conscious experience is of the eye gliding smoothly across the page. In fact the eye is rapidly saccading, fixating every 7-9 characters -- a fact bourne out by eye-tracking studies.
Just as the difference between the experience of reading and how it really works is huge, so the difference between the experience of attention and how it really works is also huge. For good or ill we are caught in a world of metaphorical attentional blinks which, like literal eye-blinks, we usually don't notice because consciousness papers over the cracks.
→ Part 6 of a series on the psychology of attention →
[Image credit: Aussie Patches]

Join 22301 readers




I am glad that attention is getting so much attention.
Psyblog Guy or Gal? I do have a question about how “research studies" are conducted. In the Christian realm some people are taught to pay attention to their feelings (this is how they believe God communicates with them), others are trained to pay attention to their own thoughts, and still others pay attention to a source outside of themselves (like the Bible). I am wondering if research studies take into account how a person has been taught to pay attention. This would make a big difference in the results, wouldn’t it?
I was in an elevator on the 1st floor. i close my eyes, take a breath, and the doors open to reveal the 24th floor, and my stop
i agree with you kat! i do think that would change the results... but i am also sure that researchers have most things into account when they conduct studies..
Most cognitive psychologists are not interested in "individual differences", they are usually interested in the universal aspects of how the mind works, those aspects that all people share. They do this by using large samples of people in their experiments (usually more than 20 people). Any individual differences should cancel out, leaving only what is shared by all the participants.
What is interesting about the attentional blink experiments though is that the effect (the blindness) wears off with practice, a fact which rarely appears in the scientific literature (but is known by many researchers).
Kat, there has been a huge interest in meditation and how that changes your ability to focus your attention. This research is very new (it's only started to be looked at over the last ten years). I'm sure there are some good books out there on it.
Thank you Bronson, I am still working on Emotional Brain. Many, many years ago I took antidepressants for depression. What is my learning style? Somebody should have asked me that question. I learned through experience (wasn't much of a studier). The antidepressants worked like magic – no more depression. What did I learn from the experience? I learned that antidepressants worked like antibiotics. I believed that rape had been “killed” by those little pills. Fast forward fifteen years … full blown PTSD. I was raging mad when I realized that antidepressants hadn’t solved my problem. Felt kind of dooped. I decided not to use psychology or psyche drugs right then and there. Bought a Bible, got through it all. Butttt I have softened a bit and now do believe that inductive reasoning can get at the truth and that if God chooses to help the world through medicine, who am I to refute Him.
Kat I've been wondering the same thing, good question. No answer, but this is interesting/funny, relating to the attentional blink.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ahg6qcgoay4
Mike, I did not see the moon walking bear LOL This is exactly why implicit memories are so important to the type of skill performance.