The halo effect in psychology is the idea that one trait about a person is used to make an overall judgment about them, e.g. what is beautiful is good.
The ‘halo effect’ is a classic finding in social psychology.
It is the idea that global evaluations about a person (e.g. she is likeable) bleed over into judgements about their specific traits (e.g. she is intelligent).
It is sometimes called the “what is beautiful is good” principle, or the “physical attractiveness stereotype”.
It is called the halo effect because a halo was often used in religious art to show that a person is good.
The saint is bathed in heavenly light, just as people are bathed in a metaphorical positive light, mainly by their appearance.
History of the halo effect
The halo effect was coined by American psychologist Edward L. Thorndike.
Thorndike noticed that when evaluating other people tall and attractive people were automatically assumed to be more intelligent and ‘better’ than others.
Physical appearance is the single strongest predictor of the halo effect.
Another well-known psychologist Solomon Asch found that people’s first impressions were extremely important for the halo effect.
Hollywood stars demonstrate the halo effect perfectly.
Because they are often attractive and likeable we naturally assume they are also intelligent, friendly, display good judgement and so on.
That is, until we come across (sometimes plentiful) evidence to the contrary.
In the same way politicians use the ‘halo effect’ to their advantage by trying to appear warm and friendly, while saying little of any substance.
People tend to believe their policies are good, because the person appears good.
It’s that simple.
But you would think we could pick up these sorts of mistaken judgements by simply introspecting and, in a manner of speaking, retrace our thought processes back to the original mistake.
In the 1970s, well-known social psychologist Richard Nisbett set out to demonstrate how little access we actually have to our thought processes in general and to the halo effect in particular.
The classic study
Nisbett and Wilson wanted to examine the way student participants made judgements about a lecturer (Nisbett & Wilson, 1977).
Students were told the research was investigating teacher evaluations.
Specifically, they were told, the experimenters were interested in whether judgements varied depending on the amount of exposure students had to a particular lecturer.
This was a total lie.
In fact the students had been divided into two groups who were going to watch two different videos of the same lecturer, who happened to have a strong Belgian accent (this is relevant!).
One group watched the lecturer answer a series of questions in an extremely warm and friendly manner.
The second group saw exactly the same person answer exactly the questions in a cold and distant manner.
Experimenters made sure it was obvious which of the lecturers alter-egos was more likeable.
In one he appeared to like teaching and students and in the other he came across as a much more authoritarian figure who didn’t like teach at all.
After each group of students watched the videos they were asked to rate the lecturer on physical appearance, mannerisms and even his accent (mannerisms were kept the same across both videos).
Consistent with the halo effect, students who saw the ‘warm’ incarnation of the lecturer rated him more attractive, his mannerisms more likeable and even is accent as more appealing.
This was unsurprising as it backed up previous work on the halo effect.
The halo effect operates unconsciously
The surprise is that students had no clue whatsoever why they gave one lecturer higher ratings, even after they were given every chance.
After the study it was suggested to them that how much they liked the lecturer might have affected their evaluations.
Despite this, most said that how much they liked the lecturer from what he said had not affected their evaluation of his individual characteristics at all.
For those who had seen the badass lecturer the results were even worse – students got it the wrong way around.
Some thought their ratings of his individual characteristics had actually affected their global evaluation of his likeability.
Even after this, the experimenters were not satisfied.
They interviewed students again to ask them whether it was possible their global evaluation of the lecturer had affected their ratings of the lecturer’s attributes.
Still, the students told them it hadn’t.
They were convinced they had made their judgement about the lecturer’s physical appearance, mannerisms and accent without considering how likeable he was.
The halo effect in business
The halo effect in itself is fascinating and now well-known in the business world.
According to ‘Reputation Marketing‘ by John Marconi, books that have ‘Harvard Classics’ written on the front can demand twice the price of the exact same book without the Harvard endorsement.
The same is true in the fashion industry.
The addition of a well-known fashion designer’s name to a simple pair of jeans can inflate their price tremendously.
But what this experiment demonstrates is that although we can understand the halo effect intellectually, we often have no idea when it is actually happening.
This is what makes it such a useful effect for marketers and politicians.
We quite naturally make the kinds of adjustments demonstrated in this experiment without even realising it.
And then, even when it’s pointed out to us, we may well still deny it.
The halo effect in the workplace
The halo effect commonly affects hiring, performance reviews and many other aspects of the workplace.
The halo effect may even be one of the most common biases operating in this area.
Managers typically give higher ratings to workers who are attractive or very enthusiastic or very well-dressed, rather than on their skill at doing the job.
One famous example of the halo effect is the finding that attractive food servers earn more tips than their less attractive counterparts (Parrett, 2015).
How to avoid the halo effect
So, the next time you vote for a politician, consider buying a pair of designer jeans or decide whether you like someone, ask yourself whether the halo effect is operating.
Are you really evaluating the traits of the person or product you thought you were or is the halo effect interfering?
Perhaps some global aspect is bleeding over into your specific judgement?
This simple check on the halo effect could save you voting for the wrong person, wasting your money or rejecting someone who would be a loyal friend.
→ This post is part of a series on the best social psychology experiments:
- Halo Effect: Definition And How It Affects Our Perception
- Cognitive Dissonance: How and Why We Lie to Ourselves
- Robbers Cave Experiment: How Group Conflicts Develop
- Stanford Prison Experiment: Zimbardo’s Famous Social Psychology Study
- Milgram Experiment: Explaining Obedience to Authority
- False Consensus Effect: What It Is And Why It Happens
- Social Identity Theory And The Minimal Group Paradigm
- Negotiation: 2 Psychological Strategies That Matter Most
- Bystander Effect And The Diffusion Of Responsibility
- Asch Conformity Experiment: The Power Of Social Pressure
Hello, and welcome to PsyBlog. Thanks for dropping by.
This site is all about scientific research into how the mind works.
It’s mostly written by psychologist and author, Dr Jeremy Dean.
I try to dig up fascinating studies that tell us something about what it means to be human.