Music + Body Language = More Excitement
Seeing a band live is a much more engaging experience than listening to a recording at home. But it's not just the atmosphere of a live event, it's also the singer's facial expressions and gestures which enhances our emotional experience.
It's a rare singer whose face remains impassive as they sing. Think of jazz greats like Ella Fitzgerald, blues artists like B. B. King or pop acts like Michael Jackson. As they sing, their faces are conveying the emotion in the music, sometimes it seems, even struggling with the emotions. Part of the beauty of a live performance is seeing singers' faces as they interact with both the music, the other musicians and the audience. Their facial expressions often seem part of the music itself.
Facial expressions affect perception of music
In what way, then, do facial expressions while singing affect the perception of the music? There is a well-known phenomenon in psychology called the McGurk effect. This demonstrates that what listeners hear is profoundly affected by what they see. This suggests that singers' facial movements may have large effects on how we perceive music.
In a series of simple experiments, Thompson, Graham and Russo (2005) showed just how important the McGurk effect is when we are looking at singers, compared to when we only have the sound to go on.
Experiment 1: Some participants listened to blues legend B. B. King audio only, while others listened and watched him. Those who had both video and audio channels rated the level of 'dissonance' (when the music was negative or discordant) higher at points in which B. B. King winced his eyes, rolled his head back and shook his upper body.
Experiment 2: When trying to judge the pitch changes between notes, participants watching only the video almost did as well as those only listening to the audio. This is pretty impressive.
Experiment 3: Here some participants saw facial expressions relating to pitch changes that matched the audio, while others saw facial expressions that didn't. When the video didn't match the audio people were less accurate at judging pitch.
This is like an auditory McGurk effect. Because the video is suggesting the pitch goes down, people's average ratings of the pitch is lower despite the fact they can hear exactly how much the pitch is going up.
Experiment 4: This experiment used the fact that sung major intervals (series of notes) sound 'happy' and minor intervals sound 'sad'. In some conditions participants heard a 'happy' series of notes but saw a seemingly unhappy singer. In other conditions intervals were consistent with facial expressions. Participants rated the emotional component of the intervals more highly if audio and video were congruent.
Experiment 5: This time participants heard real musical performances, some while watching the accompanying video, some without. Here it was found that sometimes the visual channel added to the performance, and sometimes it reduced it.
These experiments are showing a variety of basic ways in which the facial expression of a performer can have a great influence over our perception of music. Facial expressions and body movements can change the pitch we hear, how much emotion we experience and can interact with the music in surprising ways.
That said, it's clear that not all the visual aspects of musical performance are good. Some body language that performers use may actively reduce our enjoyment of the music.
Culture and music

Thinking more broadly, it's interesting to reflect on the cultural context in which music is produced. Thompson, Graham and Russo (2005) point out that it wasn't until the invention of the phonograph that the aural elements of music were split off from the visual.
Modern technological innovations like the iPOD have further reinforced that separation. The coming of pop videos has created another layer of visual meaning to music. This layer, however, often has little to do with the facial expressions and hand gestures of the artist and more to do with the vision of video producers and directors. It's not often that a music video is a straight film of the band performing the track.
Not just listening, but also watching music
But perhaps we are turning the corner? With the iPOD video singers' visual performance has the potential to be reunited with the aural experience of music. Will people return to not just listening to music, but also watching it?
Certainly nowadays many musicians make the majority of their money from live performances of their music rather than from sales of their albums. Indeed some of them are even giving their albums away for free.
This may be part of a cultural recognition that music is more than just sound, it is an interaction between singer and audience, a big bit part of which is the artist's facial expressions and gestures. It's this interaction on which we are beginning to place a higher value.
» Read more from PsyBlog on the ways music influences mood and the personality secrets hidden in your MP3 player.
Reference
Thompson, W.F., Graham, P., & Russo, F.A. (2005). Seeing music performance: Visual influences on perception and experience. Semiotica, 156, 203-227. [PDF of full article]

Join 22301 readers




Interesting! I love watching guitarists (and similar instruments) and their facial movements, it's like they are singing what they are playing - not words but the notes.
BTW: Michael Jackson's face wouldn't move now if you set his feet on fire.
One of the most fascinating performers to me is John Mayer. It would be interesting to know if his music became popular before or after his relatively few video performances.
I have a copy of the album "Neck and Neck" by Chet Atkins and Mark Knopfler. It is one of the most enjoyable albums I think I've ever heard. I often wish I could see them as they play, in fact, I've searched the Internet a number of times hoping to find a dvd of this performance.
GLS, good point about Michael Jackson!
Chris, yes, I think in the past dvds of performances tended to be seen as a bit pointless. As you say though, it's great to see some of the guys performing. Good luck with getting hold of it...
As a sax player, I'd be interested to see how this applies to instruments where the face is partially (or fully?) obscured. I'd say that in spite of the fact that my mouth is pretty well locked in place that the rest of my face goes through some interesting expressions when I'm really playing hard, and I think that the audience does respond to that. It seems like they especially like it when I close my eyes - maybe the more I concentrate on what I'm doing, the more they like it. I think they also respond to other body language that I present, like bending over, or stomping my feet when playing something particularly intense.
Of course, my playing has less discrete meaning than a set of song lyrics do, but I still think that the emotional message is largely retained intact.
Of course I can only speak to my experience! I know that the plural of "anecdote" is not data. Further study is called for.
Will, sounds highly plausible - perhaps you're being too cautious?
Also, I hadn't heard that 'plural of anecdote' one before - very good!
I once heard a choir conductor say that the greatest performers in the world open their soul to an audience. I think this is true whether it's playing an instrument or singing. Addressing Will's point about instrumentalists...I recently went to the Seattle Symphony and saw a the Mozart Requiem and a clarinet concerto by Mozart. I could not believe how musical the clarinetist was. He physically moved with the phrasing, his body was so engaged and he communicated with the conductor. It was awesome (especially for a clarinet concerto!). As a singer and conductor, I'm always impressed when an instrumentalist inspires his or her audience with not only their playing, but also showing their passion for playing.
Thanks for your comment Justin. It's true, it is fantastic when musicians really engage with the music rather than treating it like just another day on the job.
I enjoyed reading this. Especially the comments. It's always good to get a perspective from other musicians.
I'm a jazz pianist. And when I'm playing, I too go through various facial expressions and body movements. However, I don't do it intentionally. It just happens when I'm "locked in the groove"
With that being said: when playing a particular song you're not so fond of; or sessioning for a band who's style is not your particular cup of tea - where you just find it hard to get into that groove - Must one 'act out' fake facial expressions and body language for a better effect for the audience?
If so, can this be practised?