At a Royal Institution lecture last night on the worst ideas on the mind there were some polite, but nevertheless underhand, tactics on show in an attempt to sway the vote towards one of four ideas. The ideas were lobotomy, drug company advertising, post-trauma counselling and the Freudian theory of hysteria.
Each speaker had ten minutes to convince us that their idea was the worst idea anyone had ever had on the mind. Ultimately, simple disgust won over the audience and lobotomy took the title.
I voted for drug company advertising or more specifically, as explained by Joanna Moncrieff, drug company promotion of the 'chemical imbalance' hypothesis of mental illness.
What's my reasoning? Well the idea of people with depression having a chemical imbalance is such a widespread, and incorrect, idea that it needs to be challenged publicly. The problem is that it directly leads to the idea that depressed people need to take drugs to 'rectify' this so-called imbalance. Many psychologists and even growing numbers of psychiatrists would agree that this approach is fundamentally flawed and there is little or no evidence for it.
What about the other contenders? Yes, trauma counselling has now been found to be worse than useless but now we know that and so presumably we'll stop doing it. Lobotomies are almost, but not quite, extinct; so why get particularly upset about them nowadays? Freud's theory of hysteria triggered many of his later discoveries and the occassional modern misdiagnosis of a conversion disorder is a small price to pay for the foundation of psychoanalytic ideas.
I realise that my stance is utilitarian and focussed on the present, but that, I think is where we need to remain.
If allowed more philosophical leeway I would point to Cartesian dualism as the worst idea on the mind. The idea that mind and brain are separate just goes on and on and on and on to the most tedious degree. If your mind isn't your brain then what the hell is it? No, actually, please don't answer that, it'll only give me a headache.
And without further ado, the Mind Hacksters have the results for both best and worst ideas on the mind.
Making Habits, Breaking Habits
In his new book, Jeremy Dean--psychologist and author of PsyBlog--looks at how habits work, why they are so hard to change, and how to break bad old cycles and develop new healthy, creative, happy habits.
→ "Making Habits, Breaking Habits", is available now on Amazon.Reviews
The Bookseller, “Editor’s Pick,” 10/12/12 “Sensible and very readable…By far the most useful of this month’s New You offerings.”
Kirkus Reviews, 1/1/13 “Making changes does take longer than we may expect—no 30-day, 30-pounds-lighter quick fix—but by following the guidelines laid out by Dean, readers have a decent chance at establishing fulfilling, new patterns.”
Publishers Weekly, 12/10/12 “An accessible and informative guide for readers to take control of their lives.”