<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Predictably Irrational by Dan Ariely (Book review)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spring.org.uk/2008/04/predictably-irrational-by-dan-ariely.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spring.org.uk/2008/04/predictably-irrational-by-dan-ariely.php</link>
	<description>Understand your mind with the science of psychology -</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 10:30:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy (PsyBlog author)</title>
		<link>http://www.spring.org.uk/2008/04/predictably-irrational-by-dan-ariely.php/comment-page-1#comment-21532</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy (PsyBlog author)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spring.org.uk/2008/04/predictably-irrational-by-dan-ariely-book-review.php#comment-21532</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment Erica - I will do!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment Erica - I will do!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erica</title>
		<link>http://www.spring.org.uk/2008/04/predictably-irrational-by-dan-ariely.php/comment-page-1#comment-21515</link>
		<dc:creator>Erica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spring.org.uk/2008/04/predictably-irrational-by-dan-ariely-book-review.php#comment-21515</guid>
		<description>I will follow up on your recommendation! As a sometimes-reader of Ariely&#039;s research and a student of judgment and decision making, I&#039;d like to add that this sort of research ought to convince us to modify our definition of &quot;rational&quot;. As you say, economics holds us to a standard that isn&#039;t descriptively accurate and - i&#039;d like to add - perhaps not normatively optimal either. Sometimes we are smart (should i have use inverted commas there?) to use the shortcuts and biases that are labelled irrational! Like our emotions: they often guide our judgments - in a good way!&lt;br /&gt;Anyway, that&#039;s my two cents. Love reading the blog, keep it up please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will follow up on your recommendation! As a sometimes-reader of Ariely's research and a student of judgment and decision making, I'd like to add that this sort of research ought to convince us to modify our definition of "rational". As you say, economics holds us to a standard that isn't descriptively accurate and - i'd like to add - perhaps not normatively optimal either. Sometimes we are smart (should i have use inverted commas there?) to use the shortcuts and biases that are labelled irrational! Like our emotions: they often guide our judgments - in a good way!<br />Anyway, that's my two cents. Love reading the blog, keep it up please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
